A few functions in init/initramfs.c are so simple that I don't see why *any*
point in them having to bear the cost of a function call.
Wouldn't something like the patch below make sense ?
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
---
init/initramfs.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-git3-orig/init/initramfs.c 2005-09-22 00:28:39.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-git3/init/initramfs.c 2005-09-24 01:21:55.000000000 +0200
@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ static void __init error(char *x)
message = x;
}
-static void __init *malloc(size_t size)
+static inline void __init *malloc(size_t size)
{
return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-static void __init free(void *where)
+static inline void __init free(void *where)
{
kfree(where);
}
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void __init read_into(char *buf,
static __initdata char *header_buf, *symlink_buf, *name_buf;
-static int __init do_start(void)
+static inline int __init do_start(void)
{
read_into(header_buf, 110, GotHeader);
return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|