Crazy Idea: Replacing /dev using sysfs over time

[Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>]

I wonder if in the future, we can just eliminate /dev altogether (or map it 
via sysfs until older apps move away from /dev). It just seems we could 
represent major,minor in a sysfs node: 

        /sys/class/block/
        `-- sda
            |-- sda1
                    | - major
                    | - minor
                    | - raw
            |-- sda2
                    | - major
                    | - minor
                    | - raw
            `-- sda3

and so forth, or under a different branch elsewhere.

Does it make sense? Logical? Illogical? Do we really need /dev other than for 
historical/legacy purposes?

Shawn.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/