On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Alok Kataria wrote:
> As pointed by Christoph, In kmalloc_node we are cheking if, the allocation is
> for the
> same node when interrupts are "on", this may lead to an allocation on another
> node than intended.
> This patch just shifts the check for the current node in __cache_alloc_node
> when interrupts
> are disabled.
Alokk, could you verify that this patch works?
Petr, could you check that this patch fixes your issue? I am a bit
skeptical. I do not think we have found the real problem yet. We need to
have some way to reproduce the problem if it still persists after applying
Alokk's patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |