Re: [patch] sys_epoll_wait() timeout saga ...

[Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>]

Hi Andrew,

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:05:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch uses the kernel min() macro, that is optimized has 
> >  single compare by gcc-O2. Andrew, this goes over (hopefully ;) the bits 
> >  you already have in -mm.
> 
> OK, well I've rather lost the plot with all the patches flying around.
> 
> I now have one single patch against epoll.c, below.  Please confirm that
> this is what was intended.   If not, I'll drop it and let's start again.

Well, this one is fine. However, since there are possible overflows in
msec_to_jiffies() that I fixed in another patch, it would be cleaner to
only rely on this function's ability to detect overflows. Moreover, using
this function removes the divide for most common values of HZ, which is
interesting on some archs.

As Davide mentionned it, the EP_MAX_MSTIMEO constant would be useful for
other parts of the kernel (starting with sys_poll()). That's also what my
fix to jiffies.h does.

If you don't feel comfortable with so much changes at once, it's better
to first apply Davide's fix, then later the jiffies one, and then after,
I could resend the ep_poll() and sys_poll() patches to use the functions
in jiffies.h instead of doing their own magics.

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/