Jeff Dike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:20:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > sysrq t is broken (and stays),
>
> There's a fix on the way for that. This has nothing to do with interrupt
> context anyway.
>
> > but additionally there are some warnings from
> > some commands (enable sleep inside spinlock checking and spinlock debugging),
> > which go to the down_read inside handle_page_fault IIRC. So try to run in
> > process context.
>
> Which ones? They should be fixed.
>
> It is fairly fundamental to sysrq that it work from interrupt context. You
> may be diagnosing a system which can't context switch any more.
>
> This patch should be dropped, and the real problems fixed.
>
Well Linus has just merged this patch. If you hadn't removed me from the
cc yesterday this would not have happened.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |