On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2005 14:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > Umm, no - adding set_fs/get_fs mess for things like that is not right.
>
> I think it's fine. We're using it for various other interfaces too. In fact
> sys_set_mempolicy is already used elsewhere in the kernel too.
It should really be do_set_mempolicy instead to be cleaner. I got a patch
here that fixes the policy layer.
But still I agree with Christoph that a real vmalloc_node is better. There
will be no fuzzing around with memory policies etc and its certainly
better performance wise.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |