On Thursday 22 September 2005 14:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Umm, no - adding set_fs/get_fs mess for things like that is not right. I think it's fine. We're using it for various other interfaces too. In fact sys_set_mempolicy is already used elsewhere in the kernel too. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- References:
- [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
- Next by Date: [PATCH] repair nfsd/sunrpc in 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 (and other -mm versions)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- Index(es):
