Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?

Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rather than sitting around for another six months hoping the problem
> will go away (it won't), perhaps we should just update/merge Jen's
> patch as a sorely needed interim fix.

As a datapoint, we've been shipping it in Ubuntu for a month or so now
and we haven't had any reported problems.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• References:
  • SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
    • From: Joshua Kwan <[email protected]>
  • Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
• Next by Date: Re: Process with many NPTL threads terminates slowly on core dump signal
• Previous by thread: Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
• Next by thread: Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]