Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joshua Kwan wrote:
Is Jens' patch still relevant? If so, should it be rediffed and merged
into mainline? It doesn't seem to cause any weird side-effects.

More importantly, I would be inclined to properly rediff Jens' patch and
merge it into Debian 2.6.12 kernel sources if there aren't any such
side-effects, since it benefits everyone using SATA and suspend-to-ram
(that is, users of relatively modern laptops.)

Jens' patch is technical correct for SATA, but really we want to do more stuff at the SCSI layer (see James Bottomley's response to Jens' patch).

Unfortunately, this also implies that we have to figure out which SCSI devices are available to be power-managed, and which SCSI devices are on a shared bus that should never be suspended.

So currently we are in limbo...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux