Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:
> I'm doin OK.
Good to hear.
> Patch volume isn't a problem wrt the simple mechanics of handling them.
> The problem we have at present is lack of patch reviewing bandwidth. I'll
> be tightening things up in that area. Relatively few developers seem to
> have the stomach to do a line-by-line through large patches, and it would
> be nice to refocus people a bit on that. Christoph's work is hugely
> appreciated, thanks.
>
> Famous last words, but the actual patch volume _has_ to drop off one day.
> In fact there doesn't seem to much happening out there wrt 2.6.15.
Due to changes coming through git or that there will simply be fewer
things that need to be patched?
As for 2.6.15 I know I have patches in the queue that I intend to send
out later this week, which probably count. I wonder if other developers
are similar.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |