On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> I think you are not following the proper procedure. All the patches
> should go through akpm.
One issue is that I actually worry that Andrew will at some point be where
I was a couple of years ago - overworked and stressed out by just tons and
tons of patches.
Yes, he's written/modified tons of patch-tracking tools, and the git
merging hopefully avoids some of the pressures, but it still worries me.
If Andrew burns out, we'll all suffer hugely.
I'm wondering what we can do to offset those kinds of issues. I _do_ like
having -mm as a staging area and catching some problems there, so going
through andrew is wonderful in that sense, but it has downsides.
Andrew?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |