Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications

Hi,

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:

> well, I thought that is what my patch did, so please
> could you elaborate on the 'properly' part, as this
> might be the missing information here ...

"It's more important to keep related definition together and organize them 
logically."

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
    • From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rc2] fix incorrect mm->hiwater_vm and mm->hiwater_rss
• Next by Date: Re: help interpreting oom-killer output
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] eliminate CLONE_* duplications
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]