On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:53:51PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > please elaborate _why_ we would want a bunch of
> > additional DEFINE entries in each arch instead of a
> > simple include file?
>
> It's more important to keep related definition together and organize
> them logically, than spreading definitions over zillion header files
> for the only purpose to be usable from asm. If you want to cleanup
> sched.h and properly break it up, please go ahead, but I'm afraid that
> will be a lot more work than adding a few defines to asm-offsets.c.
well, I thought that is what my patch did, so please
could you elaborate on the 'properly' part, as this
might be the missing information here ...
TIA,
Herbert
> bye, Roman
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |