Re: [patch] stop inotify from sending random DELETE_SELF event under load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 12:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> > > 
> > > I really think that the patch I sent out yesterday is as good as it gets.  
> > > If you want immediate notification, you should ask for notification about
> > > name changes in a particular directory. IN_DELETE_SELF notification on a
> > > file simple is _not_ going to be immediate.
> > 
> > But then it's too early.  Note that with your patch we still get removal
> > of _any_ link to our inode (even though it's alive and well and we'd never
> > heard about the sodding link in the first place) terminating all events
> > on it.
> 
> Yes. What is in the current 2.6.14-rc2 tree doesn't do that. It considers 
> inodes "global". But it won't work reliably on networked filesystems, I 
> think.
> 
> Anyway, I do believe that IN_DELETE_SELF is stupid, but that you migth 
> re-arm it if you get it. 

Is there some reason we can't just do this from vfs_unlink

inode = dentry->inode;
iget (inode);
d_delete (dentry);
fsnotify_inoderemove (inode);
iput (inode);

This would allow us to have immediate event notification, and avoid a
race with the inode going away, right?

I think the path below will make link handling as good as it can get, by
sending IN_DELETE_SELF every time inode->i_nlink goes down, and when
inode->i_nlink == 0, send the IN_IGNORE event. Also, it stuffs
inode->i_nlink into the cookie giving user space a clue about the status
of the inode.

Index: linux/include/linux/fsnotify.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/fsnotify.h	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/include/linux/fsnotify.h	2005-09-20 18:46:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -63,8 +63,9 @@
  */
 static inline void fsnotify_inoderemove(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_DELETE_SELF, 0, NULL);
-	inotify_inode_is_dead(inode);
+	inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_DELETE_SELF, inode->i_nlink, NULL);
+	if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+		inotify_inode_is_dead(inode);
 }
 
 /*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux