Re: [patch] stop inotify from sending random DELETE_SELF event under load

[Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:36:11AM -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 05:24 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:03:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > One possibility is to mark the dentry deleted in d_flags. That would mean 
> > > something like this (against the just-pushed-put v2.6.14-rc2, which has 
> > > my previous hack).
> > > 
> > > Untested. Al?
> >  
> > Uhh...  I still don't understand which behaviour do you want.
> 
> 
> > 	* removal of this link, at the moment when it stops being accessible
> > [ none of the above, better done from vfs_...() ]
> 
> That is the behaviour we want, how does Linus's second patch not
> accomplish this? 

fd = open("foo", 0);
unlink("foo");
sleep for ten days
close(fd);

	Linus' patch will send event on close().  Ten days since the moment
when any lookups on foo would bring you -ENOENT.

	Could you please describe the semantics of your events?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/