Horst von Brand wrote:
>Nikita Danilov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>It is supposed to go into the kernel, which is not exactly warning-free.
>
>
While I have no passionate feelings about Nikita's ifdef, I must note
that Reiser4 will always be warning free within 3 days of my finding out
that somebody left a warning in.;-)
I hate messy code.;-)
The rest of the kernel should be fixed to be warning free.
>Besides, you don't know what idiotic new warnings the gcc people might
>dream up the next round, so just relying on no warnings is extremely
>unwise.
>
>
I find the above unconvincing.
Is that what this thread boils down to, that you guys think the compile
should fail not warn?
>As was said before: It it is /really/ wrong, arrange for it not to compile
>or not to link. If it isn't, well... then it wasn't that wrong anyway.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |