Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )

On Maw, 2005-09-20 at 10:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  Since some of the other major contributors to the kernel appear to
> >  also disagree with the statement, I think that the entry in
> >  CodingStyle must be removed.
> 
> Nobody has put forward a decent reason for doing so.  

I've seen five decent reasons so far. Which of the reasons on the thread
do you disagree with and why ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] trivial: delete 2 unreachable statements in drivers/block/paride/pf.c
• Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
• Next by thread: Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]