On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:50:46PM -0400, Sean wrote:
> On Tue, September 20, 2005 12:44 pm, Jan Dittmer said:
> > I know, but for multiple people testing daily releases it's much easier to
> > say -git1 worked -git2 didn't. Sure, for searching the patch `git bisect`
> > is priceless but for regular testing the -gitx thing comes very handy.
> > Otherwise you can get a arbitrary intermediate state of linus tree if
> > you're pulling at the wrong moment. It's actually also faster I suppose
> > to get one patch than running `git pull` - at least with a cold cache
> > (it used to be in the 0.1 days of git).
> > Just my .02,
>
> That's a good point. Guess it would be useful if the HEAD commit was
> documented along with each -gitX release.
Look for 41-byte *.id files in snapshots dir.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |