On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:08:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> FYI, my hacks now look like (attached). I'll push changes to linux-z
> in few hours.
Some questions:
@@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long
#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
printk("[<%08lx>] ", where);
print_symbol("(%s) ", where);
- printk("from [<%08lx>] ", from);
- print_symbol("(%s)\n", from);
The "from" address provides good hints about the exact path we got to
the called function. You don't really want to get rid of that because
it makes following backtraces harder. I'm not sure why you've made
the other changes in that file either.
+/* those must never be empty
+ unfortunately they cause problems with older binutils
ASSERT((__proc_info_end - __proc_info_begin), "missing CPU support")
ASSERT((__arch_info_end - __arch_info_begin), "no machine record defined")
+*/
Get a better binutils. 8)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mcp-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mcp-core.c
--- a/drivers/mfd/mcp-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mcp-core.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
+#include <asm/arch/mcp.h>
#include "mcp.h"
#define to_mcp(d) container_of(d, struct mcp, attached_device)
This looks bogus - why is this needed?
@@ -186,7 +192,12 @@ static int mcp_sa11x0_probe(struct devic
*/
Ser4MCSR = -1;
Ser4MCCR1 = data->mccr1;
- Ser4MCCR0 = data->mccr0 | 0x7f7f;
+#if 1
+ if (machine_is_collie())
+ Ser4MCCR0 = MCCR0_ADM | MCCR0_ExtClk;
+ else
+#endif
+ Ser4MCCR0 = data->mccr0 | 0x7f7f;
Ditto.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |