Re: ctime set by truncate even if NOCMTIME requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > However if you know the cases where time is set implicitly by the
> > server, why can't you simply optimise away the ATTR_CTIME and/or
> > ATTR_MTIME?
> 
> How?  By checking whether ATTR_SIZE is also set?  Yes, that would work
> for truncate(), but it's rather more ugly than the proposed check for
> IS_NOCMTIME.

I have to correct myself: it seems, the check is not needed.  Ctime is
never set explicitly.  So filesystem can simply ignore ATTR_CTIME, and
do the right thing without it.

ATTR_MTIME is _only_ set in utime[s], which all filesystems want to
honor.

So I think the only thing CIFS needs is simply to ignore ATTR_CTIME.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux