Re: ctime set by truncate even if NOCMTIME requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



må den 19.09.2005 Klokka 15:58 (-0500) skreiv Steve French:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> >It is quite correct for the kernel to request that the filesystem set
> >ctime/mtime on successful calls to open(O_TRUNC).
> >  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm
> >  
> >
> I agree that it is correct to set ctime/mtime here, just not convinced 
> it it worth setting it twice which is what will happen for non-local fs.
> 
> client truncate -> client setattr(for both size and ctime) -> server 
> setattr (which will have a sideffect of ctime to be set on the server, 
> not just the change to file size) and then another call to the server to 
> set the ctime (which will end up setting ctime twice - one to the 
> (correct) server's time and once to the less correct client's time.

If the VFS sets ATTR_[ACM]TIME, you should always assume that you are
being requested to set the [acm]time to server time. Doesn't CIFS allow
you that option?

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux