CC-List trimmed On Saturday 17 September 2005 20:15, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > At least reiser4 is smaller. IIRC xfs is older than reiser4 and had more > > time to optimize code size, but: > > > > reiser4 2557872 bytes > > xfs 3306782 bytes > > And modules sizes: > > reiser4.ko 442012 bytes > xfs.ko 494337 bytes All this is fine and dandy, but saying "My code is better than yours!!" still doesn't solve the issue this thread hopes to achieve, that being "I'd like to get reiser4 into the kernel". There seems to be a lot of (historical?) tension present here, but all that seems to be doing is making things worse. PLEASE keep this thing a tad on par. Keeping this up is hurting everyone more than helping. I wish I could say something as simple as "let's just be friends", but that's saying a lot. I can say this though: this is open source, and that means that our source is open, and we should be too. Chris White
Attachment:
pgpsMISZsgIZC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- References:
- I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14-rc1 breaks tg3 on ia64
- Next by Date: mmap (2) vs read (2)
- Previous by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- Next by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- Index(es):