Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> writes:


+	if ( (!error) && IS_SYNC(inode)) {
+		error = write_inode_now(inode, 1);
+	}

We don't need to sync the data pages at all here. And I think it is
not right place for doing this.  If we need this, since we need to see
O_SYNC for fchxxx() VFS would be right place to do it.
I see, I'll look into those.

But, personally, I'd like to kill the "-o sync" stuff for these
independent meta data rather. Then...
--
Hiroyuki Machida		machida@sm.sony.co.jp		
SSW Dept. HENC, Sony Corp.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux