On 9/6/05, Jim Ramsay <[email protected]> wrote: > However, I have seen the occasion where a single IRQ is used to signal > both a DMA completion AND a hotplug event. Of course in this case the > hotplug event itself would be ignored completely. > > So I would recommend getting rid of that check entirely. Hey Jim, Not that I disbelieve you, but do you have an example of a controller where this happens? I've done a lot of testing and never seen this... Luke Kosewski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Lukasz Kosewski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Lukasz Kosewski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- From: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- Prev by Date: Re: VM balancing issues on 2.6.13: dentry cache not getting shrunk enough
- Next by Date: Re: Automatic Configuration of a Kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
- Index(es):
