On Wednesday 14 September 2005 08:59 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Pavel.
>
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 08:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't
> > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix
> > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done
> > without excessive ammount of code.
>
> No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please
> find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's
> Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I
> know),
swsusp2 seems to be the common/trivial name for suspend2 (at least while
struggling to get any kind of suspend working here, helpful people have
refered to suspend2 as swsusp2)
> how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly
> differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate
> users.
if he would use that people would get quite confused and not know if people
mean your suspend2 or his swsusp2
Just a thought,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |