Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roland McGrath wrote:
If you don't like this idea at all, please let me know if there any other way of solving the invisible threads problem, short of taking out ->permission() altogether from proc_task_inode_operations.


Have you investigated my suggestion to move __exit_fs from do_exit to
release_task?

Roland,

No, I had missed this completely. Sorry.

I just gave it a quick try and it seems to be working fine. I have only moved __exit_fs to the top of release_task, not moved exit_namespace after it. I will try to run some tests to see if this is working fine. Thanks a lot.

Thanks and regards,
Sripathi.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux