Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads

> If you don't like this idea at all, please let me know if there any other 
> way of solving the invisible threads problem, short of taking out 
> ->permission() altogether from proc_task_inode_operations.

Have you investigated my suggestion to move __exit_fs from do_exit to
release_task?


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
    • From: Sripathi Kodi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
    • From: Sripathi Kodi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: devfs vs udev FAQ from the other side
• Next by Date: [PATCH 08/11] jfs: jfs_delete_inode must call clear_inode
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]