From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:17:17 -0700 > But even 1 Million dst cache entries would be 16+4 MB additional for > a 4 cpu box....is that too much? Absolutely. Per-cpu counters are great for things like single instance statistics et al. But once you start doing them per-object that's out of control bloat as far as I'm concerned. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- References:
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix stack alignment for signal handlers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use kzalloc instead of malloc+memset
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu
- Index(es):
