On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:08:26PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:56:23PM +0100, J?rn Engel wrote:
> > After spending some hours last night and this morning hunting a bug,
> > I've found that a different include order made a difference. Some
> > files don't work correctly, unless config.h is included before.
>
> I'm still of the opinion that we should add
>
> -imacros include/linux/config.h
>
> to the gcc command line and stop bothering with trying to get
> linux/config.h included into the right files and not in others.
> (which then means we can eliminate linux/config.h from all files.)
Yes, absolutely. That would help fixing lots of mess.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |