Re: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Okay, so, I have so far gathered:

- the whole module interface change between 2.4 and 2.6 was because some security concerns, most of the stuff (loading module etc.) moved towards kernel - query_module is gone, there is no syscall similar in function but with different name - losing of query_module also prevents binary-only modules (guesswork@work) - /proc/modules and /sys/module interface doesn't by far supply what query_module could do

My questions are:
a) Are my observations correct? Where did I go wrong?
b) Is there any planned replacement of query_module, or extendind sysfs or procfs module interface? c) Wouldn't revamping query_module also allow binary-only modules, therefore easier decisions for vendors, whether to support Linux?

Thanks in advance and sorry for these probably quite silly questions.

 - iSteve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux