Re: Pure 64 bootloaders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Joe Bob Spamtest <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:32:05 -0700

> Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> >> /lib64 is an awful scheme.  I'd avoid it.
> > I'd like to see people move away from it before it gets too entrenched
> > too.
> 
> agreed -- as far as i'm concerned the 32 bit libraries are there for 
> compatibility's sake and should be in /lib/compat/<subarch> instead of 
> /lib. the native libraries should be in /lib instead of /lib64. lib64 
> should just go away!

64-bit isn't any more "native" than 32-bit on some 64-bit platforms.
32-bit is the default and most desirable userland binary format on
sparc64 for example.  So 32-bit programs on sparc64 are as "native" as
64-bit ones might be considered.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux