Re: [2.6-GIT] NTFS: Release 2.1.24.

[Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>]

Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

[...]

> > BTW Anton, while looking for the best permission masks to be used when
> > mounting my NTFS paritions, I spotted what I think is a bug, or at
> > least an inconsistency between the way all fs drivers I use handle
> > umasks & friends, and the way NTFS does it. Basically, all the other
> > fs drivers take an octal representation of the masks. NTFS, instead,
> > seems to use _decimal_

> NTFS takes any.  It is happy with octal, decimal, and hex.  The ntfs 
> driver uses linux/lib/vsprintf.c::simple_strtoul() with a zero base which 
> autodetects which base to use so if you use umask=0222 it will take this 
> as octal and if you use umask=222 it will take this as decimal and if you 
> use 0x222 it will take this as decimal.

> I do not see what is wrong with that.  It behaves exactly like I would 
> expect it to.  Maybe I have strange expectations?  (-;

At least chmod(1) takes /only/ octal, so 666 isn't the number of the beast,
but plain rw for everybody ;-)

I think this should be consistent with that.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/