Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au> wrote: > > I compared ext2,ext3,xfs,vfat,reiser and reiser4. > > The hands-down winner was ext2. All the others showed problems of either lower disk throughput > or dropped frames during video capture. ext2 is a good filesystem. For that sort of application all the journaling gunk can really get in the way. You should have tested ext3 with data=writeback. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness - ext2/3/reiser4/xfs comparison
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness - ext2/3/reiser4/xfs comparison
- References:
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- RE: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: "Roger Heflin" <rheflin@atipa.com>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Nate Diller <nate.diller@gmail.com>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Nate Diller <nate.diller@gmail.com>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Nate Diller <nate.diller@gmail.com>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness - ext2/3/reiser4/xfs comparison
- From: Anthony Wesley <awesley@acquerra.com.au>
- Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SPI subsystem
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.13-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness - ext2/3/reiser4/xfs comparison
- Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness - ext2/3/reiser4/xfs comparison
- Index(es):
