Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get
> > line wrapped.)
> >
> > A trivial addition to the EFL definitions.
>
> Why? They're obviously not needed in kernelspace..
linux/elf.h has lots of stuff not needed in kernel space,
but it seems useful to make it a faithful full description
of ELF.
BTW we actually considered using TLS on x86-64 for the PDA.
The only reason it hasn't been done yet is that the necessary
binutils are not wide spread enough yet.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |