Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get
> line wrapped.)
> 
> A trivial addition to the EFL definitions.

Why?  They're obviously not needed in kernelspace..

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> 
> diff -Npru 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h
> --- 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h	2005-08-29 01:41:01.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h	2005-03-16 12:24:42.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ typedef __s64	Elf64_Sxword;
>  #define STT_FUNC    2
>  #define STT_SECTION 3
>  #define STT_FILE    4
> +#define STT_COMMON  5
> +#define STT_TLS     6
>  
>  #define ELF_ST_BIND(x)		((x) >> 4)
>  #define ELF_ST_TYPE(x)		(((unsigned int) x) & 0xf)
> 


---end quoted text---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/