On 9/8/05, Matthew Dharm <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:14:36AM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > I think I have found a possible bug:
> > [...]
> > I suppose the scsi code could be changed to guarantee that
> > srb->request_buffer is page-aligned or cache-aligned, but that seems
> > like the wrong solution for this bug.
>
> Fixing the SCSI layer is -exactly- the correct solution. The SCSI layer is
> supposed to guarantee us that those buffers are suitable for DMA'ing, and
> apparently it's violating that promise.
Thanks, I'll check on what buffer I'm actually getting, where it's
allocated, and post back what I find, or how I fixed it.
--
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |