On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:14:36AM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > I think I have found a possible bug: > [...] > I suppose the scsi code could be changed to guarantee that > srb->request_buffer is page-aligned or cache-aligned, but that seems > like the wrong solution for this bug. Fixing the SCSI layer is -exactly- the correct solution. The SCSI layer is supposed to guarantee us that those buffers are suitable for DMA'ing, and apparently it's violating that promise. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver What, are you one of those Microsoft-bashing Linux freaks? -- Customer to Greg User Friendly, 2/10/1999
Attachment:
pgpNRkQHjK7pA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Linux-usb-users] Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- From: Jim Ramsay <jim.ramsay@gmail.com>
- Re: [Linux-usb-users] Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- References:
- Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- From: Jim Ramsay <jim.ramsay@gmail.com>
- Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] move i386's enabling of fxsr and xmmxcpt
- Next by Date: Re: Strange LVM2/DM data corruption with 2.6.11.12
- Previous by thread: Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- Next by thread: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
- Index(es):
