On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:05:30PM -0500, Brian King wrote: > I reverted the patch to use a spinlock and added a comment. > How does this look? Fine with me. Ball is in akpm/Paul's court. grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- From: Brian King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
- Next by Date: Re: kernel status, "Elitegroup K7S5A"
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)
- Next by thread: [PATCH][RESEND] don't allow sys_readahead() on files opened with O_DIRECT
- Index(es):
