RE: [PATCH 2/3 htlb-fault] Demand faulting for hugetlb

["Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>]

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
>>[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Adam Litke
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:59 AM
>>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Cc: ADAM G. LITKE [imap]
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 htlb-fault] Demand faulting for hugetlb

>>+retry:
>>+	page = find_get_page(mapping, idx);
>>+	if (!page) {
>>+		/* charge the fs quota first */
>>+		if (hugetlb_get_quota(mapping)) {
>>+			ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>>+			goto out;
>>+		}
>>+		page = alloc_huge_page();
>>+		if (!page) {
>>+			hugetlb_put_quota(mapping);
>>+			ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>>+			goto out;
>>+		}
>>+		if (add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, idx, GFP_ATOMIC)) {

Here you lost hugetlb_put_quota(mapping);


>>+			put_page(page);
>>+			goto retry;
>>+		}
>>+		unlock_page(page);

As for regular pages, kernel is used to unlock mm-> page_table_lock
before find_get_page and relock it before setting pte. Why isn't the
style followed by huge page fault?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/