Michael Matz wrote:
As "extern inline" is a GNU extension I don't understand this remark.
Sort of.
C99 has the equivalent construct, but spell it differently:
inline foo(int bar) {
...
}
extern foo(int bar);
There is no "static inline" in C99 either; it's just "inline".
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Terrence Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Terrence Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- From: Michael Matz <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- Prev by Date: RE: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5194] New: IPSec related OOps in 2.6.13
- Next by Date: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"
- Index(es):
