Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:00:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It isn't the same, but "static inline" is the correct variant.
> 
> "extern inline __attribute__((always_inline))" (which is what
> "extern inline" is expanded to) doesn't make sense.

It does make sense and is different from
static inline __attribute__((always_inline)).
Try:
static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foo (void) {}
void (*fn)(void) = foo;
vs.
extern inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foo (void) {}
void (*fn)(void) = foo;
In the former case, GCC will emit the out of line static copy of foo
if you take its address, in the latter case either you provide foo
function by other means, or you get linker error.

	Jakub
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/