Re: (alpha) process_reloc_for_got confuses r_offset and r_addend

[Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 9/5/05, Chaskiel Grundman <cg2v@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> arch/alpha/kernel/module.c:process_reloc_for_got(), which figures out how
> big the .got section for a module should be, appears to be confusing
> r_offset (the file offset that the relocation needs to be applied to) with
> r_addend (the offset of the relocation's actual target address from the
> address of the relocation's symbol). Because of this, one .got entry is
> allocated for each relocation instead of one each unique symbol/addend.
> 
> In the module I am working with, this causes the .got section to be almost
> 10 times larger than it needs to be (75544 bytes instead of 7608 bytes).
> As the .got is accessed with global-pointer-relative instructions, it
> needs to be within the 64k gp "zone", and a 75544 byte .got clearly does
> not fit. The result of this is that relocation overflows are detected
> during module load and the load is aborted.
> 
> Does anyone see anything wrong with this analysis? I tested a patch that
> makes the obvious change to struct got_entry/process_reloc_for_got and it
> seems to work ok.
> 
> (Please cc me on replies. thanks)

Why not post the patch you made for review as well?

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/