Ben Dooks napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:38:26PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev napsal(a):
static inline void
uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)
{
- printk("%s%d", drv->dev_name, port->line);
+ printk(KERN_INFO + "%s%d", drv->dev_name, port->line);
plus sign between that?
printk(" at ");
why the fellows didn't put this to the line above?
switch (port->iotype) {
case UPIO_PORT:
printk("I/O 0x%x", port->iobase);
And what about these?
looks like they're not on a newline, so need no severity.
ok, ok, but isn't this a little bit racy (so you can see dev_name and
line, then another driver's info and then " at ", then something else...)
regards,
--
Jiri Slaby www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
~\-/~ [email protected] ~\-/~
241B347EC88228DE51EE A49C4A73A25004CB2A10
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |