Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:01:57PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Maybe not. Another option would simply be to bump it up
significantly (2x isn't really that much.) 4096, maybe.
I wonder if we're not at the point where we need something different
to what we have now. The concept of a command-line works for passing
simple state but for more complex things it's too cumbersome.
Well, we have initramfs for the really big stuff. The kernel shouldn't
really need that much data, though.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |