Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: HDAPS, Need to park the head for real

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 25 2005, Jon Escombe wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >@@ -1661,6 +1671,9 @@
> >                where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT;
> >                rq->flags |= REQ_PREEMPT;
> >        }
> >+       if (action == ide_next)
> >+               where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT;
> >+
> >        __elv_add_request(drive->queue, rq, where, 0);
> >        ide_do_request(hwgroup, IDE_NO_IRQ);
> >        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
> >
> >Also puzzles me- why is this needed ?
> 
> I wanted the park command to get in at the head of the queue (behind the 
> currently executing request).
> 
> Contrary to the comments for ide_do_drive_cmd(), ide_next didn't appear 
> to do anything to achieve this? At least from my initial testing before 
> I made this change - it could take a second or so for the park command 
> to be issued if the disk was busy....

That part seems to have been lost, apparently. The above patch is
correct.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux