Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: HDAPS, Need to park the head for real

[Jon Escombe <lists@dresco.co.uk>]

Alan Cox wrote:
> @@ -1661,6 +1671,9 @@
>                 where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT;
>                 rq->flags |= REQ_PREEMPT;
>         }
> +       if (action == ide_next)
> +               where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT;
> +
>         __elv_add_request(drive->queue, rq, where, 0);
>         ide_do_request(hwgroup, IDE_NO_IRQ);
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
>
> Also puzzles me- why is this needed ?

I wanted the park command to get in at the head of the queue (behind the 
currently executing request).

Contrary to the comments for ide_do_drive_cmd(), ide_next didn't appear 
to do anything to achieve this? At least from my initial testing before 
I made this change - it could take a second or so for the park command 
to be issued if the disk was busy....

Regards,
Jon.

______________________________________________________________
Email via Mailtraq4Free from Enstar (www.mailtraqdirect.co.uk)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/