Re: [PATCH] removes filp_count_lock and changes nr_files type to atomic_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin a écrit :

OK, well I would prefer you do the proper atomic operations throughout
where it "really matters" in file_table.c, and do your lazy synchronize
with just the sysctl exported value.


But... I got complains about atomic_read(&counter) being 'an atomic op' (untrue), so my second patch just doesnt touch the path where nr_files was read.

Furthermore, a lazy sync would mean to change sysctl proc_handler for "file-nr" to perform a synchronize before calling proc_dointvec, this would be really obscure.

Unless the fs people had a problem with that.

And you may as well get rid of the atomic_inc_return which can be more
expensive on some platforms and doesn't buy you much.
  atomic_inc;
  atomic_read;
Should be enough if you don't care about lost updates here, yeah?


You mean :

atomic_inc(&counter);
lazeyvalue = atomic_read(&counter);

instead of

lazeyvalue = atomic_inc_return(&counter);

In fact I couldnt find one architecture where the later would be more expensive.

Nick


Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux