Re: select() efficiency / epoll

On 8/23/05, Davy Durham <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> However, I'm getting segfaults because some pointers in places are
> getting set to low integer values (which didn't used to have those values).

Is it possible that you are overwritting the pointers with file
descriptors, as those would have low integer values?

-- 
Rakshasa

Nyaa?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: select() efficiency / epoll
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • select() efficiency
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>
  • Re: select() efficiency
    • From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
  • Re: select() efficiency / epoll
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm2 - complete list of warnings gcc 4.0.1
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2
• Previous by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
• Next by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]