On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:56:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [ this time with a better subject ]
> >
> > "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> >
>
> Isn't 'extern inline' an old gcc trick to force inlining? (instead of
> just hinting)
For gcc >= 3.1, we are already telling the compiler that it should
either inline the code or abort compilation.
"extern inline" doesn't make much sense. And it gives a warning with
-Wmissing-prototypes.
I'm currently cleaning up warnings with -Wmissing-prototypes to get them
to an acceptable level. -Wmissing-prototypes will help us to enforce a
coding style that will avoid a class of nasty runtime errors that are
currently sometimes hitting us.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |