Re: [2.6 patch] fs/adfs/adfs.h: "extern inline" doesn't make sense

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ this time with a better subject ]
> 
> "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> 

Isn't 'extern inline' an old gcc trick to force inlining? (instead of
just hinting)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] fs/adfs/adfs.h: "extern inline" doesn't make sense
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] "extern inline" doesn't make sense
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • [2.6 patch] fs/adfs/adfs.h: "extern inline" doesn't make sense
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
• Next by Date: [PATCH] mips: add more SYS_SUPPORT_*_KERNEL and CPU_SUPPORTS_*_KERNEL
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/adfs/adfs.h: "extern inline" doesn't make sense
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/adfs/adfs.h: "extern inline" doesn't make sense
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]